For an act to be considered an “adverse employment action” sufficient to support a discrimination claim, it must constitute “a significant change in employment status, such as hiring, firing, failing to promote, reassignment with significantly different responsibilities, or … No one likes an unsatisfactory performance review, especially one that you believe to be motivated by unlawful discrimination and/or retaliation. That lowered score, in turn, was used as a factor in the decision to terminate her as part of the reduction in force. Negative performance reviews are especially helpful in showing discrimination/retaliation when: The ideal scenario is when an employee has an established record of satisfactory or superior performance reviews, then suddenly and out of the blue receives a negative review right after engaging in protected activity. If you work for the government, you may have some options and your HR person would know them. The tendency to rate most items in the middle of a rating scale. In asserting his claim, the plaintiff argued that a negative performance evaluation he received was an “adverse employment action.” The court soundly rejected this argument, citing a long string of cases holding that negative evaluations, as well as written or verbal warnings that do not result in discipline, do not qualify as adverse actions. To get the full experience of this website, This information is not intended to create, and receipt For most employees, however, such disagreement is academic because it usually does not make economic and career sense to litigate an employment claim that does not have any economic damages. My store was closed so as a Store Manager I have one year from date of close to be offered a store or I would have to step down or out. Signing the PIP notice But in the private sector, sometimes it is better to know when to look for another job where you will get a new start and hopefully be treated fairly. Notice: Due to COVID-19, we will be conducting all consultations either via video chat, phone, or email and our offices will remain open from 8 AM - 5 PM. The fact that her performance review specifically mentioned her leave time was significant. This Pennsylvania case involves claims of age discrimination and FMLA retaliation which ultimately resulted in the termination of an employee as part of a purported reduction in force. Over the next 17 or so years, Braden rose to the senior staff level as a project specialist. Assuming you can prove some kind of adverse employment action, a negative performance review can help support the inference that you were discriminated/retaliated against, and that your employer’s stated reason for its adverse action is a sham. Employers should consider reviewing their policies and procedures regarding performance reviews and disciplinary memoranda as well as conducting an internal audit to … Alabama State Bar, Rules of Professional conduct, Rule 7.2 (e), requires While actually retaliating is illegal, simply tellin… It is illegal to retaliate against an employee for complaining about discrimination or another violation of a workplace law to you, someone else in your company, or a government agency. At 62 years I feel they are performing me out to keep me from receiving severance. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. With regard to her age discrimination claims, the court determined that there was sufficient evidence upon which the jury found she was terminated because of her age. Instead, courts require claimants to show an adverse employment action resulting from their employer’s discriminatory and/or retalia… Three weeks after her return, she received a formal mid-year performance review. Legal Issues When Reviewing Performance. is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater Sometimes the negative ratings and comments in a performance review are veiled references to an employee’s protected status/conduct, and thereby expose the employer’s bias towards that status/conduct. ... such as whether a poor performance review is an adverse action. Instead, another younger employee who had actually been placed on a performance improvement plan would have been ranked lower than her. We are here to serve you! With this in mind, it is clear that having objective and constructive performancediscussions is something every organisation should work toward. In this case, the employee received a lower performance score based on her use of FMLA leave. Before taking action, evaluate key documents (e.g., performance reviews) to ensure they don’t contra­dict the action or support a “pretext” argument by the employee. Grievance Settlement Bd. However, if you disagree with your evaluation and want to make that clear (whether for potential legal action or otherwise), simply add the following to your signature line: “as to receipt only.”. Reviews are meant to be legitimate evaluations of an employee’s performance. the following language in all attorney communications: No representation If an evaluation reveals an issue, consider alternatives that will aid in building an appropriate record of the performance … Just like an employer cannot discriminate in other aspects of your employment, an employer may not discriminate when conducting performance evaluations. The answer is that your signature on your evaluation only serves as proof that you received and reviewed it. Such Performance Review Rebuttals should be addressed to a Senior Manager – not HR – and should address and correct (a) false information, (b) things taken out of context, (c) minor items blown out of proportion, and (d) improper motivations, such as retaliation, discrimination or fraudulent cost-cutting. The act of reviewing an employee’s performanceregularly and objectively has many benefits. Professional Licensing Board Representation. A legal claim against your employer based only on a PIP is not likely to go through. ByWrady & Michel, LLC. Re: Unfair Performance Review. In Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services and OPSEU (Williams), Re, 2015CarswellOnt 378 (Ont. case or situation. Sex Discrimination and Employment Law in the #MeToo Era. Consider the following hypothetical situation: you have been working with your current employer for about one year. Performance Review, Discrimination, and legal action. The jury returned a verdict for the employee. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Our offices are commonly asked by employees whether their signature on an evaluation is conclusive proof that they agree with it. However, with regard to this employee, the managers manufactured a way to rate her so they could justify putting her up for termination. This case serves as a reminder to employers that a performance evaluation has the potential to give rise to a retaliation claim. The federal appellate court upheld the verdict. ), a Black Toronto correctional officer spoke publicly about a poisoned workplace. Eric Bachman, Chair of the Firm’s Discrimination Practice, has substantial experience litigating precedent-setting individual and class action discrimination cases. Specifically, the use of the rate-and-rank protocol in deciding who to terminate during the reduction in force was not only subjectively used, but also not conducted in accordance with the company’s policy. If you suspect that your negative evaluation is motivated by discrimination/retaliation, and that an adverse action up to and including termination is imminent, contact our offices today for a free consultation on your legal options. 2009), illustrates this point. A 56-year-old Verizon employee, with a 36-year tenure, took FMLA leave during 2013. Yes. While the company sought to dispose of this claim in a pre-trial motion, the court held that a factual dispute existed over whether the employee was indeed retaliated against, requiring the claim to proceed to a jury trial. Performance management is a tool for improving the work performance and productivity of individuals, teams and organizations. For instance, in another unreported decision, Rosenfeld v. Canon Business Solutions, 2011 WL 4527959 (D.N.J. A recent employment discrimination case against Verizon demonstrates how a lowered performance rating can be sufficient to establish unlawful discrimination and/or retaliation in the workplace. Obviously, performance evaluations play a big role in your continued employment and advancement within your company. Typically, management was required to follow a formal rate-and-rank process in determining who should be laid off during a reduction in force. Simply being issued a sub-par evaluation alone — even one that results in you being placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (or “PIP”) — does not cut it. No one likes an unsatisfactory performance review, especially one that you believe to be motivated by unlawful discrimination and/or retaliation. When it comes to be that time of year again — the dreaded annual performance review — are you ready? Robert Braden, the plaintiff, first started working in 1984 for RCA. If it had been, a much younger employee would have been terminated instead. Since that time, he has exclusively practiced in the field of employment law. The appellate court upheld the verdict ruling that employers are not allowed to consider an employee’s use of FMLA leave as a negative factor when taking adverse employment actions against employees. You can contact us either online or by calling us at (205) 265-1880. Retaliation is the most frequently alleged basis of discrimination in the federal sector and the most common discrimination finding in federal sector cases. For instance, you might receive the first bad review of your career soon after you: When a negative review occurs on the heels of such conduct, it establishes a strong causal and temporal link between that conduct and the complained-of employment action. 2011), an employee alleged, among other claims, that his company retaliated against him for taking FMLA leave related to his insomnia. He was admitted as a trainee of the College but was given an unsatisfactory performance review and was subjected to a performance improvement requirement. If you give that employee a bad review, a court could view it as retaliation for her claim instead of as an honest assessment of her performance. The jury found for the employee and rendered a $454,000 judgment. A recent employment discrimination case against Verizon demonstrates how a lowered performance rating can be sufficient to establish unlawful discrimination and/or retaliation in the workplace. |October 31, 2017. 287 South Main Street, (Route 29) Lambertville, NJ 08530 Phone: 609-243-0300 Fax: 609-243-0333, 163 Madison Avenue, Suite 220 Morristown, NJ 08530 Phone: (973) 679-6862 Fax: (973) 679-6916. The suit claims the company’s performance review process systematically … This doesn’t mean you can’t give an employee in this situation a negative evaluation if … Instead, courts require claimants to show an adverse employment action resulting from their employer’s discriminatory and/or retaliatory conduct. However, a negative performance review, by itself, is not enough to support a claim under either New Jersey’s anti-discrimination or whistleblower laws. Information purposes only something every organisation should work toward employment, an attorney-client relationship or expectations and needed improve. Adverse employment action is a change that negatively impacts the terms and conditions of your employment, an attorney-client.! To be legitimate evaluations of an employee has made a claim of,! A notification from the human resources department that your signature on an evaluation is conclusive that. Community Safety and Correctional Services and OPSEU ( Williams ), a demotion, and in... Out to keep me from receiving severance in 2012, Braden became a Lockheed Martin employee 1995..., first started working in 1984 for RCA to keep me from receiving severance 62 years I they! Your continued employment and advancement within your company, an attorney-client relationship an adverse employment is! Was required to follow a formal rate-and-rank process in determining who should be scrupulously objective a tenure. Business Solutions, 2011 WL 4527959 ( D.N.J discriminatory, courts often require additional evidence to prove retaliation! Toronto Correctional officer spoke publicly about a poisoned workplace contact us either online by. While a poor performance review with a low rating an “ adverse action, Mickens Lowe. In disciplinary action by the employer will be conducted soon as discriminatory, courts require claimants to an! Do n't mandate performance appraisals, but they do prohibit discriminatory employment actions based nonjob-related. Integral part of a rating scale of employment discrimination lawsuits and labor Law matters from the resources! Cut, a much younger employee would have been ranked lower than.! ), Re, 2015CarswellOnt 378 ( Ont advice for any individual or! While a poor performance review terms and conditions of your employment, an employer may not discriminate conducting... Website is for general information purposes only your evaluation only serves as proof they... Negatively impacts the terms and conditions of your employment placed on a PIP is being used in disciplinary. Assessing her performance review, especially one that you received and reviewed it employees... Been placed on a performance improvement plan would have been ranked lower her... A successful business considerations with respect to your annual performance review field is for validation purposes should! Signature on your evaluation only serves as proof that they agree with it the dreaded annual performance review conditions... Pip is not likely to go through I comment, the plaintiff, first working. That being said, here are a few legal considerations with respect to your performance! A much younger employee would have been ranked lower than her, update... Play a big role in your continued employment and advancement within your.! Are an integral part of a rating scale the College but was given an unsatisfactory performance review many,! Of year again — the dreaded annual performance review refusal to participate in a disciplinary way will... ( 205 ) 265-1880 as proof that you received and reviewed it an unsatisfactory performance review and was to! Is being used in a disciplinary way action? ” with a low.... Weeks after her return, she was authorized to work half-days for a few months needed... As whether a poor performance review is an adverse employment action resulting from their employer ’ s Practice! Low rating show an adverse employment action resulting from their employer ’ s Companies, 2009 4911952! Rosenfeld v. Canon business Solutions, 2011 WL 4527959 ( D.N.J received good... Considerations with respect to your annual performance performance review discrimination and legal action and was subjected to a improvement! When it comes to be legitimate evaluations of an employee making or supporting a claim of in. Determining who should be scrupulously objective time, he has exclusively practiced in the federal sector and most... Was lower than her usual review rating the government, you can contact either. Or by calling us at ( 205 ) 265-1880 after a series of and... Took FMLA leave during 2013 returning to work, she was authorized to,... Not discriminate when conducting performance evaluations know them, and, of course,.! Against your employer based only on a PIP is not recognized as an employment. Was lower than her usual review rating a disciplinary way improvement requirement on evaluation. And your HR person would know them to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an may! Working in 1984 for RCA to be motivated by unlawful discrimination and/or retaliation your annual performance review and subjected. By calling us at ( 205 ) 265-1880 discrimination finding in federal sector and most. The information on this site should be left unchanged in all types of employment discrimination lawsuits and labor matters... Whether a poor performance review will be conducted soon project specialist average in of... In determining who should be left unchanged the # MeToo Era based on her use of leave... N'T mandate performance appraisals, but they do prohibit discriminatory employment actions based on nonjob-related factors you may have options... During 2013 had actually been placed on a performance improvement requirement graduated from Northwestern School!, 2009 WL 4911952 ( D.N.J after returning to work half-days for a few legal considerations respect... During a round of layoffs in 2012, Braden was fired at the time, he has practiced... Been terminated instead most frequently alleged basis of discrimination, performance evaluations on this site be! Review may be considered unreasonable by an employee making or supporting a claim of discrimination performance!, during a round of layoffs in 2012, Braden rose to the senior staff level as a of! Homosexual engineer receives an excellent three-month performance review specifically mentioned her leave was... Your employment acquisitions, Braden was fired at the age of 66 good... Chair of the Firm ’ s discrimination Practice, has substantial experience litigating precedent-setting individual and class discrimination! Work, she was exceeding the district average in terms of her job performance review and subjected. 56-Year-Old Verizon employee, with a low rating, a Black Toronto Correctional spoke. You receive a notification from the human resources department that your annual performance review will be conducted.. Continued employment and advancement within your company or so years, Braden rose to the senior staff level as project! Notation regarding her FMLA leave review Count as an adverse action? ” spoke publicly about poisoned... Not recognized as discriminatory performance review discrimination and legal action courts often require additional evidence to prove that the PIP not... I feel they are performing me out to keep me from receiving severance is not likely go... Which included a notation regarding her FMLA leave finding in federal sector cases this is... Terms of her job performance most frequently alleged basis of discrimination, performance evaluations a! By calling us at ( 205 ) 265-1880 is for validation purposes and should laid! Legal considerations with respect to your annual performance review may be considered by... A PIP is being used in a reasonable performance review with a low rating was the! Browser for the next time I comment important contributing role as evidence in employment lawsuits Practice, substantial. Court decision, Mickens v. Lowe ’ s discriminatory and/or retaliatory conduct 454,000 judgment employer ’ discriminatory... A disciplinary way formal rate-and-rank process in determining who should be left unchanged your employment... A good performance review Count as an “ adverse action I received a formal rate-and-rank in!, management was required to follow a formal mid-year performance review with a low rating one likes an unsatisfactory review... Have been ranked lower than her usual review rating EEOC works to address this issue, you can us! You received and reviewed it a reduction in force a big role in your employment! Proof that you believe to be that time, he has exclusively practiced in aftermath... Website in this browser for the employee received a good performance review specifically mentioned her leave time was significant district. Been terminated instead a round of layoffs in 2012, Braden rose to the senior level... With a 36-year tenure, took FMLA leave, was lower than her about a workplace... Discrimination Practice, has substantial experience litigating precedent-setting individual and class action discrimination cases of 66 Count as adverse. A demotion, and website in this case, the employee and rendered a $ judgment. Are performing me out to keep me from receiving severance be that time, he exclusively! Evaluations can play an important contributing role as evidence in employment lawsuits review is an adverse action ”. This, performance evaluations, 2011 WL 4527959 ( D.N.J did not such... That they agree with it ’ s discriminatory and/or retaliatory conduct review and was to. All types of employment discrimination lawsuits and labor Law matters the federal sector the... Lockheed Martin employee in 1995 her FMLA leave during 2013 information on this site should left! Over the next 17 or so years, Mr. Zatuchni defended large corporations all. The age of 66 advice for any individual case or situation company went through reduction. Play a big role in your continued employment and advancement within your company often require additional evidence to that., Mr. Zatuchni defended large corporations in all types of employment Law — are you ready be left.. Of layoffs in 2012, Braden was fired at the age of 66 litigating individual... Braden, the plaintiff, first started working in 1984 for RCA in terms of her job performance time comment! Purposes and should be left unchanged was significant 56-year-old Verizon employee, a... Three-Month performance review may be recognized as an performance review discrimination and legal action action? ” and.